레슨/Theory2011. 7. 24. 14:19


[Reference]
Ryan Burchfield, S. Venkatesan, "A Framework for Golf Training Using Low-Cost Inertial Sensors," bsn, pp.267-272, 2010 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks, 2010, IEEE Computer Society

Abstract
Body Sensor Networks are rapidly expanding to everyday applications due to recent advancements in Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) sensing, wireless communication and power management technologies. We leverage these advancements to develop a framework for the use of MEMS inertial sensors as a low-cost putting coach for golf. Accurate putting requires substantial control and precision that is acquired via significant practice. Unfortunately, many golfers are not aware that they are practicing flawed mechanics. An electronic coach has the capability to point out these flawed movements before they become the norm. Our framework is the first step to an electronic coach and consists of a model for a putting swing, the design of a custom sensor platform and the implementation of signal processing functions to accurately estimate the trajectory of the golf club. Based upon our model we propose the use of sensor fusion algorithms to increase accuracy without increasing hardware demands. The accuracy of the system is experimentally evaluated using a controlled test platform.
Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 6. 20. 12:50
Expert Author Neville Walker

Putting Smart is all about putting in such a way that everything in your setup and stroke helps rather than hinders your ability to make a good putt. Why make putting more difficult than it is?

There is no one right way to putt just as there is no one wrong way to putt. However, there are smarter ways to putt. Effective putting is all about reducing the number of potential errors and compensations - and maximising your chances of success.

Because there is no right way to putt, you can make any putting method succeed if you are prepared to work at it. However, most recreational golfers don't have the time or the motivation to spend endless hours perfecting their method. Better then to adopt a method that requires the least amount of maintenance.

Here are Four Ideas towards Putting Smart:

1. Reduce Excess Tension
In your setup you want to adopt a relaxed posture with enough tilt from your hips to allow your arms to hang naturally under your shoulders. This will help to promote a free swing of your putter. If your putter is too long for you, you will be forced to bunch your elbows up into your rib cage so that you can get your eyes over the ball. This can block your arms. You want to avoid any contorted or twisted position as if you were in a badly fitted suit.

Next you should hold your putter loosely enough so that someone could easily pull it out of your hands. If your grip pressure is too tight, tension will radiate into your arms and shoulders.

2. Align Square to your Target
There are a number of different stances from open to square to closed. All of then have been successfully used by professional golfers.

However, the more the line of your shoulders deviates from a line parallel to your target, the more difficult it will be to square your putter at impact. A square stance is less error-prone.

3. Quieten your Body Motion
Putting is a gentle activity which requires a minimum of motion. The ideal is to keep your head steady with your eyes focused on one spot while avoiding any lower body movement.

The only moving part should be the triangle that is formed by your shoulders, arms and hands. This should work as an integrated unit.

4. Avoid Chasing the Ball with your Eyes
A common mistake in putting dumb is chasing the ball with your eyes as you make your stroke. In the full swing this is known as looking up. When you do this, you pull your shoulders off line left at the critical moment of impact. The smart way is to hold your follow through and listen rather than look.

It is almost impossible to improve your putting without practice. However, if your putting method is based on sound fundamentals, your chances of success are better than if your putting method is flawed from the start. The trick is to learn to putt with the percentages in your favour.

Neville Walker has a passion for golf and is actively involved in researching information on all aspects of Putting and Putter Technology. His dedicated web site http://www.better-golf-by-putting-better.com is written specifically to help fellow golfers achieve greater success on the green with the flat stick.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Neville_Walker

Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 6. 11. 09:43
Giorgos Paradisis, Julian Rees   


Putting Analysis Result (Expert and Novice Golfers, 8ft distance)
Handicap (Expert 2.3, Novice 23)

Expert is...
1.More consistence (standard deviation x2~x3)
2.More fast putter head speed (Expert 1.16 vs. Novice 0.7 m/s)
3.Less face angle change of putter head (Expert 2 vs.Novice 4.2 degree)

숙련자와 초보자에 대한 8ft(2.5m) 퍼팅 분석결과
핸디캡 (숙련자 2.3, 초보자 23)

숙련자가 초보자에 비해서...
1. 일관성이 좋다 (표준편차 3배 차이)
2. 퍼터헤드 스피드가 빠르다 (숙련자 1.16 vs. 초보자 0.7 m/s)
3. 퍼터헤드 변화각도가 작다 (숙련자 2 vs. 4.2 degree)


The aim of this study was to identify some of the kinematic parameters used by expert golfers (less than or equal to 6 handicap) to optimise putting efficiency and accuracy, and differentiate the putting techniques of elite and novice golfers. A 2D video analysis (50 Hz) were used to establish whether any differences existed for selected kinematic parameters of an 8 ft (2.46m) golf putt between expert (n = 8) and novice golfers (n = 8). Statistical analysis showed that 9 parameters from the 26 measured proved to be significantly different at the alpha level P < 0.05 between the expert and novice groups. This study assumed that expert golfers were more competent putters than novice golfers. Whilst this appears to be a reasonable claim it may not always be the case. Further improvements to the study could be to incorporate a scoring system to monitor the outcome of individual trials.

Introduction

In the modern-day game of golf, putting remains the key to shooting low scores, and the ability to hole putts can turn a good round into a great round. It has been reported that putting accounts for approximately 40% of all golf shot played (Gwyn & Patch, 1993). However, golf practice does not seem to balance the percentage out between the golf swing and the golf putt. Virtually all golfers, regardless of their level of expertise suffer inconsistencies in putting performance due to the stroke being a complex and multi-faceted motor process. This is in part due to the fact that unlike golf driving, in which the need for maximum club head speed at impact largely determines the body actions that can be successfully employed, success in putting can be achieved using a variety of techniques (Cochran & Farrally, 1994). Despite this revealing statistic and the obvious importance of competent putting, much of the pedagogical literature is based on the observations and anecdotal evidence provided by top players and coaches. There is a general lack of published scientific research and information regarding the kinematics of the putting stroke is scarce. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify some of the kinematic parameters used by expert golfers (less than or equal to 6 handicap) to optimise putting efficiency and accuracy, and differentiate the putting techniques of elite and novice golfers.

Method

The study population consisted of right-handed amateur golfers from the University of Wales Institute, Cardiff (UWIC) and Celtic Manor Golf Club, Newport (CMGC). This population was separated into two groups based on their playing ability; expert (EX) (age 23.3 ± 3.3 yrs, height 1.80 ± 0.1 m, handicap 2.3 ± 1.8, experience 9.3 ± 2.1 yrs; mean ± s) and novice (NO) (age 26.5 ± 3.2 yrs, height 1.7 ± 0.1 m, handicap 25 ± 2.6, experience 1.5 ± 0.9 yrs; mean ± s). The expert subjects had all represented UWIC in the British University championship and were practising regularly at the time of testing. Conversely, the novices from CMGC were recreational players who played on average once a week.

In order to carry out the study it was necessary to set up an artificial putting surface to allow for maximum control of potential external variables. A flat Astroturf surface was marked out with white tape (4m x 1.5m) to yield a straight putt with no break. At one end of the putting surface was a standard golf hole (4 inches in diameter) and at the other end was a designated marker that ensured that the actual distance of each putt was equidistant, regardless of an individual's set-up technique.

The order of putts was randomised for each subject until all subjects had putted once and then the procedure was repeated. This reduced the effect of muscular fatigue on the putting stroke and any learning effect that would result from continuous putting.

Two-dimensional video analysis was used to capture three trials from each performer. A Panasonic F'15HS video camera was mounted upon Manfrotto 117 rigid stationary tripods 5 m away to capture a full field of performance. The camera was positioned perpendicular to the plane of performance, operating at 25 f/s with a 1/500 s shutter speed. Nine superficial markers were attached according to the guidelines suggested by Plagenhoef (1971) on the vertex of the head and both right and left joints (glenohumeral, elbow, wrist and knee).

Before the commencement of testing each subject was allowed a considerable putting warm-up and trial period. Firstly, this was to ensure that familiarisation occurred for the pace and nap of the putting surface, and secondly, each subject needed to become accustomed to the same ball and putter being used in the investigation. After the warm-up 2-D video data was collected for each subject performing a series of putts from a set distance of 2.46m (8 ft). It was explained that the purpose of the test was to determine an individual's normal putting technique for successful putts. The order of putts was randomised for each subject until all subjects had putted once and then the procedure began again. This reduced the effect of muscular fatigue on the putting stroke and any learning effect that would result from continuous putting.

Co-ordinate digitising was undertaken on an Acorn Archimedes 420/1 microcomputer equipped with the Kine System software (Bartlett and Bowen, 1993). Generalised cross-validated quintic spline that has been derived from a program by Woltring (1986) were then applied to remove random noise. Reconstruction was based on a user-defined 13-point model. To aid interpretation of results, key moments were introduced in the analysis to divide the stroke into five phases (Figure 1), as previously defined for qualitative analysis by Burden et al. (1998).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Typical stick figure sequences at five instants of the golf putt where kinematic parameters were measured. Ball address (1), Back swing (2), Through swing (3), Ball impact (4) and Follow-through (5).

The following parameters were calculated: ball position, stance width and wrist positioning at ball address (BA), and the putter-head horizontal and vertical displacement, subject's head movement - horizontal and vertical displacement, timing of the BS, TS, FT and total putt time, angular displacement of the right and left elbow and also the angle formed by a line joining the left elbow to left wrist and putter shaft, maximum horizontal linear velocity and time it occurs, at back swing (BS), through swing (TS) and follow through (FT).

Digitising Reliability: Reliability and objectivity of the digitising process was established by repeated digitising of one sequence at the same sampling frequency with an intervening period of 48 h. The limits of agreement method (Bland and Altman, 1986) was used to compare these repeated digitised sequences and produced values for the angular displacement of the left elbow (LE) and the horizontal displacement of the putter head (PH) based on the equation MD ± 1.96 SD, where MD = mean of differences between repeated digitised sequences and SD = standard deviation of these differences, as heteroscedasticity correlation was close to zero. Given these results (Table 1) it was concluded that the digitised data were reliable and objective.

Table 1

Results & Discussion

Statistical analysis showed that 9 parameters from the 26 measured proved to be significantly different between expert and novice players at the 95% level of confidence (Table 2).

Table 2


The present study's data for hand positioning confirmed a significant difference (P<0.05). It has been agreed previously that forward hand positioning locks the wrists into a firmer position, minimising wrist involvement and ensuring that the individual putts with the larger muscles of the shoulders (Leadbetter, 1997). It was therefore possible that the potentially more reliable forward wrist positioning method of the experts resulted from this variable.

There was a significant difference (P<0.05) for mean linear displacement of the putter head between BA to final BS position. However, in contrast the BC to final FT mean linear displacement was not found to differ significantly between the groups. There has not been any definite recommendations put forward for the displacement of the putter head for the relative phases of the putting stroke. Interestingly, the novice displacements tended to agree with the pendulum theory proposed by numerous experts over the years. Their displacements from BA to BS position and BC to final FT position were approximately equidistant. In contrast the experts tended to exhibit the modern theory technique where the putting stroke is executed with the BS being substantially shorter than the FT.

There was a significant difference (P<0.05) for head displacement change between the BS to BC phase. It maybe concluded that the more important factor was whether the head was stationary at the point of ball contact. This measurement was however outside the present study's scope.

Vertical displacement for the putter head during the BS and FT phases was significantly different (P<0.05) between the two groups. Experts were characterized by shallow BS and a more pronounced vertical displacement during the FT. In contrast the novice's vertical displacement during the BS and FT was far greater than both expert phases. The greater variability found in the novice group during the back swing and follow-through phases may have resulted from the breaking of the wrists.

Putting (1998) have referred to the fact that to achieve a crisp ball strike it is desirable to accelerate the putter through the ball hitting area from a slower BS. Consequently, as acceleration is a derivative of velocity it would be expected that the greatest velocity attained would occur at or just after the BC phase. This occurred for the expert golfers (range, 1.05 -1.3 s) but was somewhat more erratic for the novice golfers (range, 0.3 -1.2 s), therefore a significant difference (P<0.05) resulted. However, because all putts analysed were successful they must have been struck at similar velocities through the BC area. Consequently, as expected no significant differences were apparent between the actual maximum horizontal velocities attained. The novice group was however more erratic in the smoothness and velocity pattern during their stroke.

Recommendations for the relative timing of the phases under investigation do not directly exist. However certain authors (Leadbetter, 1997) refer to a slow BS and then an accelerating phase into and through the hitting area. Both groups were characterised by this general trend, the experts to a greater degree than the novices, therefore no significant differences existed. The only significant difference (P<0.05) that did occur was for the FT phase, however, this is not thought to be of any great significance towards putting technique.

The main limitations of the study were the homogeneous nature of the selected groups (expert and novice golfers) and therefore any post hoc justifications towards other groups were problematical and indeed limited. Although the collection of data in the controlled environment (golf practice bay) had advantages from the viewpoint of methodological considerations, it nevertheless, did not accurately simulate the real external or competitive situation. Finally, the analysis of only one putt per analytical investigation may not always be a true reflection of an individual's technique, and the validity of using a single performance trial per subject as being representative of generalised performance outcomes must be questioned (Bates et al., 1992).

This study assumed that expert golfers were more competent putters than novice golfers. Whilst this appears to be a reasonable claim it may not always be the case. Further improvements to the study could be to incorporate a scoring system to monitor the outcome of individual trials.


Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 6. 11. 09:36

A little bit of fun and some putting tips too.

Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 6. 11. 09:30
by Dr Paul Hurrion

Quintic Ball Roll is the brainchild of internationally recognised Sports Biomechanist Dr Paul Hurrion (perhaps best known as Padraig Harrington's trusted putting advisor and biomechanics analyst over the past six years). He works with many other Tour golfers including Rory McIlroy, Oliver Wilson, Paul McGinley, Robert-Jan Derksen (featured here) and Lee Westwood. He has also applied his top level skills, knowledge and experience into the design of his own range of putters with GEL Golf

Quintic Technology – it's Trackman for putting

I have spent the last five years developing what is today known as Quintic Ball Roll Software and now use it regularly in all of my analysis when working with my clients on the putting green. Quintic Ball Roll v2.4 software is capable of analysing up to 240 frames per second, automatically recognising markers on the golf ball, and instantly producing fully digitised analysis of each putt.

The software tracks the ball for the first 30cm of its journey on a given length of putt. It then instantly and clearly shows the ball speed, side spin (cut or hook), angular rotation (degrees & RPM), vertical bounce, launch angle and point at which true roll occurs.

Crucially – and this is the most significant advance on Quintic’s already pioneering analysis tools – all of the above are reflected graphically and numerically in a summary sheet in a way that was formerly only available for full swing analysis software for irons and woods. The average, range and standard deviation of the putts are automatically updated after each putt and can be saved into a session folder. It is then possible to compare session results, for example, with different types of putter, before and after changes to the loft / lie / length of a putter and before or after a putting lesson.With the help of Robert-Jan Derksen, let me show you how it works.

The clue is in the detail – key figures reveal the true quality of impact

The screen grab that you see here (above) was taken from a recent session with Robert-Jan Derksen on the putting green at Celtic Manor. Following a simple calibration procedure (see the T-bar image) we start the session with a 12-foot straight putt. [The software can be used on all types of putts – long, short, uphill, left to right, right to left... Is there a particular length of putt your are struggling with?]

I have been working with Robert for nearly two years, and we are finally starting to see the results. In the following example, the read out on the computer reveals just what I am looking for in terms of how the golf ball reacts after contact with the putter (See Good Putt.bmp). This is as a result of a square set-up, good posture, a centre strike, no deviation in the path of the putter through the hitting area and a square putter-face at impact.

In other words, we are looking for consistency in all areas that determine the initial roll of the ball on its way to the target.

Ball speed? You can’t hope to read a green if you can’t control the pace of the golf ball. Similarly, you will never consistently roll putts on your chosen line if you impart side spin, or strike the ball with an erratic launch angle.

In recent months Robert has struggled on his initial pace control through having too much loft at impact, causing the ball to ‘jump’ and backspin after impact. But this analysis tells me he is getting much better; there is zero side spin (-2.27rpm is negligible), and the ball started its forward rotation immediately after impact. The launch angle is less than 2 degrees, which is perfect.

Other information provided by the Quintic analysis:

• Initial ball speed – 9.15 feet/sec which results in the golf ball travelling approximately 20 feet on a flat green with a Stimpmeter reading of 11.

• The point of ‘True Roll’ occurs after just 20 inches (<10%of the travel distance).

• The Launch Angle was 1.68 degrees and the result was a smooth forward roll for the first 12 inches. In my studio, the robot achieves the quickest point of True Roll with a launch angle of 1.00 degrees.When working with players, this is the launch angle I am trying to achieve, I certainly don’t want a negative launch angle as the ball will pop up as a result of being driven into the ground!

• The ball has rotated 191º after the first 12 inches of its path, with 731rpmof forward rotation at this point.

Understanding the true nature of the fault accelerates the fix...

For the purposes of revealing the sort of data we might expect on a poorly struck putt, I asked Robert to hit a ball with cut-spin.

And this is where the software really does come into its own in terms of teaching, because you would never pick up on these faults with the naked eye. This data shows the negative effect of too much cut spin on the performance of the golf ball. The cut spin number (+36.85) turns RED to highlight more than an acceptable amount of cut spin imparted on the ball at impact. This cut spin caused the ball to skid for 2 inches before starting forward rotation and it bounced significantly for the first 12 inches of its journey even though it had a good Launch Angle of 1.07 degrees.

As a result, it has taken considerably longer to reach the point of ‘True Roll’. Common causes of too much cut spin?:

• An outside-to-inside putting stroke

• An open putter face at impact

• Striking the putt out of the ‘heel’

• Putter with lie angle too low (heel high)

I advocate the left below- right grip in putting for the symmetry it gives you – i.e. levels the shoulders and facilitates a true pendulum motion.

Natural release of the putter should result in a through swing that mirrors the backswing – a natural arc either side of the ball

While cut-spin is a no-no, scientific testing using a fixed robot and a high-speed camera (1000fps) proves that up to 10 rpm of hook or cut spin imparted to the ball is acceptable as having negligible effect. [As soon as side spin increase above 10 rpm, the side spin can cause the ball to spin, bounce and stray from the intended line. Just picture a spin bowler in cricket when the ball bounces!] The increased amount of hook spin, even with a good launch angle has produced a good ‘True Roll’ value (<15%). The act of hooking the golf ball can actually produce a quicker true roll but still is the cause of deflection which is exaggerated on a right to left breaking putt (right-handed golfer), especially with a high launch angle. Common causes of too much hook spin?:

• inside to outside putting stroke

• putter face closed at impact

• striking the putt out of the ‘toe’

• putter with lie angle too high (toe high)

Why correct putter fitting is ultimately the only route to consistency

By measuring how the ball reacts as it comes of the clubface you can determine the correct loft, lie and length of the ideal putter – it’s the ultimate putter fit! The ideal launch angle (for most greens) is between 0.75 and 1.25 degrees. Slower greens (or greens that have a lot of grain) require up to 2 degrees of launch angle to get the ball up out of its resting position and riding on top of the grass. If the launch angle is too high the ball will, literally, launch up into the air, high above the grass and bounce as it’s moving towards the hole. While the ball is bouncing, it has a greater chance of being deflected off line by either the side (hook or cut) spin or imperfections in the green.

Common causes of high launch angle?

• too much dynamic loft at impact

• breaking the wrist (‘flipping’) just before impact

• having the ball too far forward in the stance

• putter with too much static loft

While the ball is skidding or sliding over the grass (with no forward rotation) it is much easier for it to be deflected off line by imperfections in the green – e.g. spike marks, pitch marks, footprints, grain. This deflection will cause a putt that started on the intended line to miss the hole and /or lose speed too quickly as a result of sliding into a slope or grain. On many occasions the golf ball rotates backwards for the first few inches. Obviously the harder a putt is struck, the more the tendency of the ball to skid.

Causes of unacceptable skid?

• too much static loft on the putter

• ineffective putter face technology

• too much dynamic loft at impact

• breaking the wrist (‘flipping’) just before impact

• having the ball too far forward in the stance

Common causes of low launch angle?

• not enough dynamic loft at impact

• hitting down on the ball with the putting stroke

• having the ball too far back in the stance

• the putter not having enough static loft

1. Perfect fit: the putter-head sits flush, while the angle of the shaft and left forearm match up.

2. NO! Putter is too upright, causing the heel to come up off the ground (causes pushed putts)

3. NO! The toe is in the air, putter sits too flat; typical symptoms include missing left, pulled putts

The majority of putters come as standard with 3 or 4 degrees of static loft. This may or may not be right for you. Analysing your personal putting stroke, your own hand position at address and impact and your preferred ball position will allow for the correct calculation of loft and lie for your putter (that’s if you can repeat it consistently?!). Ideally, especially for PGA Tournament Professionals, it would be advisable to select putters with different lofts depending on the type of green (grass type/depth /speed) you are playing to optimise the correct launch angle and therefore roll characteristics of the golf ball.

For more information, visit www.quinticballroll.com


Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 5. 23. 12:58



How To Improve Your Putting With Practice Drills: Rickard Strongert, VideoJug's resident golf expert, shows VideoJug users several practise drills to improve your golf putting.

Step 1: Short putts
Step 2: Three in a row
Step 3: In the club
Step 4: Follow- through

Note: this is not allowed on the course as the ball can contact the golf club only once.

So who said putting practice couldn't be fun? These drills will improve your game and force you to enjoy yourself at the same time!

[Source] www.videojug.com

'레슨 > Theory' 카테고리의 다른 글

Golf Putting Tip Video : Distance is important  (0) 2011.06.11
The Science of Roll  (0) 2011.06.11
Proper Putting Stroke Mechanics (2/2)  (0) 2011.05.23
Proper Putting Stroke Mechanics (1/2)  (1) 2011.05.23
Lessons on Putting Fundamentals  (0) 2011.05.23
Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 5. 23. 12:56
Aim & Contact
It is important to properly aim the putter on the intended line and to consistently strike the ball in the center of the putter face. Use aids like face impact paper to determine where the ball strikes the face. Also, use a line indicator for the intended line and set-up with the putter square to that line.

Acceleration
Acceleration means the speed of the putter head constantly increases at a steady rate from the start of the forward stroke through impact. This is an important stroke mechanic but usually is too subtle to be noticed by the golfer's eye.
Some golfers have excessive acceleration at impact. Some have a tendency to decelerate at impact. Constant acceleration is ideal to control ball speed and distance.
Acceleration can be attributed to the length of the stroke and the amount of stroke time. The more consistent a golfer is with these mechanics the more consistently they will accelerate the putter head through impact.

Putter Head Speed
The putter head speed at impact determines how far the ball will roll. Putter head speed is a direct result of acceleration mechanics. This is a learned mechanic for judging the distance for each putt.

Stroke Length, Time & Tempo
These are crucial mechanics for developing a consistent stroke. Stroke lengths will vary with different lengths of putts but the stroke time should remain about the same for putts of all lengths.

Putting Stroke Mechanic Data
Stroke times are the elapsed times for the backstroke and the forward stroke to impact. The forward stroke to impact should be about one half the time of the backstroke. Stroke time will vary some from player to player but the time for different length putts should vary no more than a fraction of a second for each player.
Therefore, stroke tempo should be about the same on all lengths of putts. Stroke Tempo is the ratio of the backstroke time divided by the forward stroke to impact time.

Natural Putters
There are natural putters but most golfers have to learn stroke mechanics. Even the natural putters have to practice sound putting stroke mechanics or they will not be so natural. Putting is simple physics that requires imparting a roll on the ball at the proper pace on the intended line. Sounds easy right?
Even the best players in the world playing on the best putting surfaces don't make all their putts. Typically, the year's best putter on the PGA Tour averages a little more then 1.7 putts per green hit in regulation and usually the average is about 28 putts per round. That is not lights out when you consider they average about 14 greens in regulation per round. But on a given week when they get in that "zone" and average 25 putts per round, they more then likely win the tournament.
Sound putting mechanics will improve putting for all golfers. Practicing putting mechanics will lower the number of putts per round and improve consistency.

[Source] http://www.clubrepairnews.com/techreport/tech-putting-stroke.htm

'레슨 > Theory' 카테고리의 다른 글

The Science of Roll  (0) 2011.06.11
How To Improve Your Putting With Practice Drills  (0) 2011.05.23
Proper Putting Stroke Mechanics (1/2)  (1) 2011.05.23
Lessons on Putting Fundamentals  (0) 2011.05.23
Pause follow-through 'Like a Pro'  (0) 2011.05.23
Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 5. 23. 12:56

By Ed Mitchell, PGA
November 2006

The most recent debate about the proper putting stroke centers around two styles:

Straight-back/straight-forward or inside/square/inside. Regardless which stroke is used, certain mechanics remain the same.

1. Stroke path must start the ball on the intended line.
2. Putter face must be square at impact to the intended line.
3. Contact must be consistently in the center of the face.
4. Putter head speed determines the distance the ball rolls.
5. Move putter head at a constant rate of acceleration during forward stroke.
6. Develop a consistent stroke time for all putt lengths.

Putter Path

It is often said that putting is all about "feel". However, to develop feel golfers need to practice a consistent stroke. It is helpful to know certain data about your putting stroke mechanics so you can practice to improve on what the data tells you. The following data points describe what you "feel" and will illustrate what you should work on to improve your stroke mechanics

Putter Face Angle To Path


[Source] http://www.clubrepairnews.com/techreport/tech-putting-stroke.htm

'레슨 > Theory' 카테고리의 다른 글

The Science of Roll  (0) 2011.06.11
How To Improve Your Putting With Practice Drills  (0) 2011.05.23
Proper Putting Stroke Mechanics (2/2)  (0) 2011.05.23
Lessons on Putting Fundamentals  (0) 2011.05.23
Pause follow-through 'Like a Pro'  (0) 2011.05.23
Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 5. 23. 12:55

Overview: The basics of a fundamentally sound putting stoke is one where the lower body stays stationary, the head is properly positioned and the upper body, the arms and shoulders, form a triangular shape and moves with a pendulum motion.

Idealy, you should swing the putter back and through at the same speed with a sense of rhythm. The goal is to return the clubface back to a square position at impact along the the target line and that stokes the ball with topspin towards the hole.

Triangle Pendulum Motion:

To begin with, let us first explain what is meant by forming a triangle with your upper body.

An imaginary triangle is formed between your arms and shoulders. Notice what is meant by this with the image to the right.

Through out your swing you will want to keep this triangle intact and the arms and shoulders working together as one unit.

Then like the pendulum movement of a grandfather clock is how you want to stoke the ball.

You want almost no wrist or hand action because they are too hard to control and keep your putter head square and on the target line. Never allow your wrists to unhinge.

 Putting Stoke Length: The lengthen of your backstroke should be about the same distance as your follow through length.

It is important to regulate your distance by changing the length of your stroke and not by trying to apply sudden burst of power with your hands.

For instance, you do not want to make a 30 foot by taking the club back only a few inches and then suddenly trying to hit hard to make the hole.

In the example to the right on a shorter putt the back stroke and follow through length should be the distance of the two inner guide balls. While the two outer balls mark the putting stroke length for a longer putt.

Your goal is a smooth, slow and even pace stroke with the shoulders moving in steady pendulum motion.

The length of the backstroke is an area where some pro trainers recommend different advice. Some advocate the 1/3 - 2/3 rule. That is, take the putter back 1/3 the length and the follow through should be 2/3 of the total length.

However, the one thing that is agreed upon is do not have your backstroke greater than your follow through. Secondly, your controlling distance by varying the length of your stoke.


A fundamental key to successful putting is having your shoulders, arms and putter act as one unit. The stroke is a smooth one piece action upper body motion with no body rotation.

The Role of Your Wrists: Basically, you do not want your wrist to be playing any role in your putting stoke. What you do not want are your wrist to flex like in the photo to the right.

This is normally disastrous and will result in to much play in the putter head. However, on very long putts it is okay for a little amount of wrist hinging because it starts to become too hard to keep your lower body stable and your posture correct.

But never the less, keep in mind that you only want to use your wrists only as much as is absolutely necessary.

The Backswing:
Begin to move the putter head back along the target line.
Use your triangle and keep your lower body body still and your head still with your eye focused on the ball.

Remember the length of the backstroke will dictate the length of the putt.

As you move your putter back along the target line your left should will lower and your right shoulder will rise. See the image to the right, the left shoulder lowers while the head remains steady.

Down Swing: The most important thing is to return the club head square at impact. Keep your arms, hands and shoulders working together and your putter should be low to the ground.

Maintain a smooth and steady pace and let the club naturally accelerate.


Your shoulders will rotate during your stroke while your head and lower body remains still.

Maintain a constant putter speed through out your stroke.

The Follow Through: The left wrist should remain flat and the right shoulder will lower. The putting stroke will continue along the target line until the length is the same as the backswing.

Pace and Rhythm: The feeling of your swing should be one of a smooth, flowing motion. Do not force the pace of your swing but do accelerate through the ball. The putter should have the same pace on the backswing and follow through but it is important that it gains speed as it strikes the ball

Putting is a game itself within the game of golf. It takes time and practice to master but with patience and concentrating on developing the proper fundamentals anyone can become good at putting.

[Source] How to Putt in Golf

'레슨 > Theory' 카테고리의 다른 글

The Science of Roll  (0) 2011.06.11
How To Improve Your Putting With Practice Drills  (0) 2011.05.23
Proper Putting Stroke Mechanics (2/2)  (0) 2011.05.23
Proper Putting Stroke Mechanics (1/2)  (1) 2011.05.23
Pause follow-through 'Like a Pro'  (0) 2011.05.23
Posted by 프로처럼
레슨/Theory2011. 5. 23. 12:51
Tiger Woods Putting Stroke


2008 Master's Practice Round

'레슨 > Theory' 카테고리의 다른 글

The Science of Roll  (0) 2011.06.11
How To Improve Your Putting With Practice Drills  (0) 2011.05.23
Proper Putting Stroke Mechanics (2/2)  (0) 2011.05.23
Proper Putting Stroke Mechanics (1/2)  (1) 2011.05.23
Lessons on Putting Fundamentals  (0) 2011.05.23
Posted by 프로처럼